Experts welcome government response to SA’s first COVID-19 case

As Health Minister Dr Zweli Mkhize came under fire in Parliament during a debate on South Africa’s readiness for a COVID-19 outbreak today experts welcomed the government’s response to the country’s first confirmed case of COVID-19.

Mkhize earlier today in a media statement said a 38-year-old man from KwaZulu-Natal has become the first person here to test positive for the COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) virus.

It has since been established that on his return from Italy the man landed at OR Tambo and then flew home to KwaZulu-Natal. Over 2 500 cases of COVID-19 and 79 deaths have been reported in Italy as of yesterday.

Mkhize said that the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) confirmed this morning (5 March 2020) that the man had tested positive for the novel coronavirus.

“The patient is a 38-year-old male who travelled to Italy with his wife. They were part of a group of 10 people and they arrived back in South Africa on March 1, 2020,” Mkhize said.

According to the Health Minister the man did not show symptoms until days after his return, which as we understand it is why he was not identified when screened at the airport. According to Mkhize the patient consulted a private general practitioner on March 3 (two days after his return), with symptoms of fever, headache, malaise, a sore throat and a cough. The practice nurse then took swabs and delivered it to the lab.

The patient has been self-isolating since March 3, presumably at his home.

Mkhize said that the Emergency Operating Centre (EOC) has identified the man’s contacts by interviewing the patient and doctor. These contacts likely include the man’s wife, his two children, the ten persons who travelled with them, and others the man had close contact with. At a press conference this afternoon it emerged that these contacts will also be asked to self-isolate.

“The tracer team has been deployed to KwaZulu-Natal with epidemiologists and clinicians from NICD. The doctor has been self-isolated as well.”

 No ‘Fool-proof screening’

The case spurred concerns among some over the effectiveness of screening processes for COVID-19, such as those being implemented at South Africa’s airports. While screening at airports involve taking people’s temperature, it does not involve taking samples from all travellers and testing those samples for the COVID-19 virus – something that would be time-consuming, expensive and likely make international travel untenable.

According to Tim Tucker, Adjunct Associate Professor at the University of Cape Town School of Public Health and Family Medicine, there will never be a “fool-proof screening technique”.

“However, we do know that many or most people with active COVID-19 have a fever. So, detecting those with a raised temperature is a good start but will have inherent problems,” he said. Tucker listed among these scenarios where people may have a fever because of another infection and these people will be flagged but not COVID-19 infected. There may be cases where people will be COVID-19 infected but does not yet have a fever or be infected ‘sub clinically’ with no symptoms and the fever may only develop later. “[So], taking a person’s temperature is a screening tool, not a perfect diagnostic test,” he said.

“We cannot test every person who comes through our border posts for COVID-19 nor should we. Thus, more simple screening processes are required.”

 Doing the right thing

According to Prof Shaheen Mehtar, an infection prevention and control (IPC) specialist at the Stellenbosch University there is always the chance that isolated cases will slip through.

Mehtar also told Spotlight that fighting an epidemic is always a team effort that includes the public. “We see that high resource settings are in the grips of an epidemic – not because they are not doing what we are, but because it is winter in the Northern Hemisphere. I think Minister Mkhize did exactly the right thing to let everyone know so that individuals can take appropriate action,” she said.

Professor Wolfgang Preiser, a virologist affiliated to Stellenbosch University’s Division for Medical Virology said screening for fever only detects people with fever. “One may take Paracetamol (sometimes used to treat fever) not out of bad faith but to cope with flying, or still be incubating and thus will not be ill yet. All that is well known and that is well realised, is that screening only goes that far,” he said.

Preiser also said self-isolation in the case where someone is ill with the infectious disease but not severely enough to warrant hospitalisation, is international best practise. “This seems to be applied in the case of the infected traveller who returned from Italy. It is very wise as it lessens the burden on the hospital system which is under stress anyway,” he said.

 Self-quarantine

According to Prof Cheryl Cohen of the NICD’s centre for respiratory diseases and meningitis, people who feel sick should self-quarantine and if they are concerned that they may be infected – should call ahead of presenting at a medical facility.

Earlier today various opposition MPs called for a comprehensive public information campaign that is becoming crucial in light of the first confirmed COVID-19 case.

During the debate EFF MP Naledi Chirwa said testing for COVID-19 ought to be extended beyond “elite spaces”. “The department cannot claim to be ready when the only testing ports we have are at airports,” said Chirwa. “The majority of our people use alternative modes of transport and our country’s borders don’t start at and end at O.R Tambo International Airport – more so because the Corona virus is not contained by imaginary borders.”

DA MP Siviwe Gwarube in turn asked Mkhize to appraise MPs on the measures that his department is taking to screen, test and possibly isolate and treat cases, particularly at every airport, harbour or border post. “We no longer can afford to target certain strategic areas,” she said.

On Wednesday a day before Mkhize announced South Africa’s first confirmed COVID-19 case, Chirwa asked him and departmental officials in Parliament what measures they have in place in addition to screening for fever at ports of entry because it is said there are ways people can suppress fever symptoms that may only show up a day or two after.

Acting Director-General in the National Department of Health Dr Anban Pillay then explained to MPs screening is not always easy. He said the department is working with officials at the airports and port health to ensure measures are in place. There are isolation areas at airports, he said, and officials, also from Home Affairs and customs are given protective gear.

Pillay said the WHO guidelines show that screening for temperature is the best thing you can do because anybody who is infected will be manifesting a temperature – at least within two days even if the person is asymptomatic with no excessive mucus or cough. “So a temperature is the earliest indicator.” Pillay told MPs it is often difficult to do other tests. “The best way to diagnose is with a pharyngeal swab  (the area behind your nose and throat) and getting a sample the first time is not easy. When people are in quarantine they can go through serial swabs to make sure that if you missed it the first time, you’ll still get it because sometimes the organism doesn’t sit in the pharynx but it doesn’t mean he’s not infected. It may be in the cells  and hasn’t replicated for whatever reason.”

According to Pillay South Africa has complied with all the guidelines on the World Health Organisation checklist of things that should be done and in that respect South Africa is ready.