Important TB drug as effective at lower dose, study findsIn 2021, TB accounted for 56 000 deaths in the country. The disease remains the leading cause of death in South Africa. PHOTO: GCIS

Important TB drug as effective at lower dose, study finds

News & Features

The treatment of drug-resistant forms of tuberculosis (DR-TB) has been transformed over the last decade with treatment becoming more effective, safer, and treatment duration in many cases dropping to under a year. Even so, treatment can still come with serious side effects and for some, it can still last over a year and a half and involve taking many different pills every day.

In a finding that may help further reduce side effects, new research has found that the dosage of the drug linezolid can be lowered without compromising how well it works. Together with another drug called bedaquiline, linezolid has been responsible for much of the recent progress.

Related Posts

Current World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend a “short” regimen of nine to 11 months for uncomplicated forms of DR-TB. This short regimen includes bedaquiline, but not linezolid. For more complicated or more drug-resistant forms of TB, the WHO recommends a “long” regimen of 18 to 20 months. Though the exact composition of such longer regimens varies, they typically include both bedaquiline and linezolid as part of a regimen comprising at least four different drugs. Linezolid is also included in both South Africa’s shorter and longer regimens for various forms of DR-TB.

But much of the evidence that the WHO advice and South African guidelines are based on is relatively uncertain. As a result, various clinical trials are underway trying to identify optimal treatment regimens for DR-TB.

Professor Keertan Dheda, general physician, pulmonologist, and a critical care specialist who heads up the Division of Pulmonology at Groote Schuur Hospital and the University of Cape Town says that an ambitious goal is to derive a treatment regimen for DR-TB that is of the same length as that for drug-sensitive TB (currently six months, although some trials have shown four months is also possible). This, he says, could be achieved through different combinations of newer drugs but the best possible combination, and whether such a goal can be attained or not is the objective of various ongoing or recently completed trials. Some important clinical trials include TB-PRACTECAL, endTB, and NEXT-TB.

The Nix study

Two trials that have arguably produced some of the most interesting DR-TB findings in recent years are Nix and now its follow-up ZeNix.

The two trials are uniquely ambitious in that they tests a six to nine-month experimental regimen of just three drugs – bedaquiline, linezolid, and pretomanid (BPaL for short) – in people with pre-XDR or XDR-TB (in other words TB that is resistant to more drugs than ‘normal’ DR-TB).

The BPaL regimen can thus be seen as an experimental alternative to the WHO’s long regimen mentioned above and a challenge to the conventional wisdom that at least four drugs are needed to cure DR-TB.

The BPaL regimen has made headlines because of the high treatment success rates in the Nix study (around 90%) – although its precise efficacy is hard to gauge since it was a single-arm study with no control group. While BPaL is clearly a vast improvement on treatments from a decade ago when most people with DR-TB were not alive five years after diagnosis, it is not known exactly how well its safety and efficacy compares to the WHO’s long regimen, which also presents a dramatic improvement over older treatments.

TB Medicine. PHOTO: Nasief Manie/Spotlight

Accordingly, given the lack of evidence from randomised controlled trials on the BPaL regimen and some safety concerns relating to linezolid and pretomanid, it is not surprising that the WHO for now still recommends that the BPaL regimen should only be used in “operational research”. Spotlight previously reported on such operational research on the BPaL regimen being done in South Africa.

As pointed out by Lindsay McKenna, TB Project co-director at the US-based NGO Treatment Action Group (TAG), rates of grade three or higher adverse events during treatment were very high in the Nix trial, requiring linezolid dose reductions or interruptions among a majority of participants. “In fact, only 37 participants (34%) completed six months of linezolid without any interruption, and only 16 participants (15%) completed six months of linezolid without interruption at a total daily dose of 1 200 mg,” she says. “As such, being able to reduce the linezolid dose and/or duration without compromising the efficacy of the BPaL regimen could improve the safety and tolerability of the regimen.”

The ZeNix study

It is in response to these concerns about linezolid that a follow-up study called ZeNix was designed.

“The aim of the trial (ZeNix) was to evaluate whether the efficacy of the BPaL regimen could be maintained while reducing a patient’s exposure to linezolid and its associated side effects,” says Dr Francesca Conradie, Principal Investigator of the ZeNix trial. “Because of the 1 200mg dose of linezolid, there was a high rate of adverse events. This was a very high dose and we had to look at other ways of reducing this without compromising the 90% efficacy of BPaL.”

ZeNix is a four-arm, double-blinded (neither doctors nor patients knew who was on which arm) clinical trial that tested different linezolid dosing strategies – six months of 1 200mg, two months of 1 200mg, six months of 600mg, and two months of 600mg (the bedaquiline and pretomanid dosing were the same in all four arms). 181 patients with highly drug-resistant forms of TB were enrolled in the study in South Africa, Russia, Georgia, and Moldova. 36 of the study participants were living with HIV.

Findings from the study were presented last week at the 2021 International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Science (the abstract can be read here).

Findings from the ZeNix study

Study arm% Treatment success% Peripheral neuropathy% Myelosuppression% Required dose modification
1200mg 6 months93382251
1200mg 2 months89241730
600mg 6 months9124218
600mg 2 months8413718
Findings taken from the ZeNix abstract published on the IAS2021 website.

As in Nix, treatment success rates in the ZeNix trial were very good, and critically, remained high with lower linezolid doses and shorter treatment durations. In the 1 200mg six-month arm, treatment success was 93%, while in the 600mg six-month arm it was 91% (see details for the other study arms in the above table).

Besides maintaining good efficacy, the lower doses were also associated with fewer adverse events and fewer patients having to undergo linezolid dose modifications (something that typically only happens if there is a problem). In the 1 200mg six-month arm 38% of patients experienced peripheral neuropathy (damage to the nervous system) compared to 24% in the 600mg six-month arm. Myelosuppression (manifesting as anaemia) was detected in 22% of patients in the 1 200mg six-month arm and by only 2% of patients in the 600mg six-month arm.

“Even with the reduced dosage of 600mg, the efficacy was still maintained and what was a win for us was that the side effects were significantly lower,” says Conradie.

Dr Norbert Ndjeka, director for drug-resistant TB, TB, and HIV at the national department of health welcomed the findings. “This is exciting,” he told Spotlight. “We will be able to treat more patients seeing that there will be a reduction in adverse events due to linezolid.”

IMAGE: Health24

Wider implications

“Whether the approaches used to optimise linezolid dosing in the ZeNix regimen will be applied to linezolid more broadly is unclear as other ongoing or recently completed drug-resistant TB treatment shortening trials take all different approaches,” says McKenna. “Any comparisons between these linezolid dosing strategies would be indirect making it difficult to determine a single optimal approach (whether one is better than another), especially given that other components of these regimens differ as well.”

A number of other studies have already opted for lower doses of linezolid prior to the ZeNix findings, with doses of 600mg and 300mg commonly being used and for varying durations. In these studies, linezolid is typically administered with at least three other drugs, unlike the two in Nix and ZeNix.

It seems unlikely that the core of the public sector DR-TB treatment guidelines in South Africa will be impacted in the near term since the standard linezolid dose for DR-TB is already 600mg. Public sector patients typically take the drug for two months, although some patients need to take it for longer.

It does however seem likely that the linezolid dosage in the context of the BPaL regimen will be reduced from 1 200mg to 600mg. This has direct implications for the BPaL clinical access programme (the operational research referred to earlier) in South Africa, but will also have broader implications should the BPaL regimen be recommended for use outside of operational research in future.

“Because we wrote the protocol for 1 200mg and it was administered per package insert, we will have to present the findings to the National Clinical Advisory Committee,” says Conradie, who is also involved with the BPaL clinical access programme. “This data is still very new but my guess is that we will have to do the 600mg a day for the linezolid. I think we will do that, why would we go for a higher dose that has higher adverse events when a lower dose has the same efficacy and has reduced adverse events?”

According to Ndjeka, the BPaL regimen is currently only available at four facilities in South Africa and only under operational research conditions. “What we are doing now is in line with World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Hopefully, in future, all our XDR-TB and Fluoroquinolone-resistant TB patients will be treated for six months with BPaL if WHO provides such guidance,” he says.

Ndjeka says he thinks the reduction of the linezolid dose in the BPaL regimen will come first and the other issues will follow with further recommendations.

Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that pretomanid has not been registered by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority. It was registered in March 2021. We apologise for the error.